Now, investigative reporters have uncovered timestamped images of Dr. #ChristineBlaseyFord's historical testimony before the #SenateJudiciar圜ommittee this week, #JudgeKavanaugh's accuser testified under oath that she's a "psychologist," yet records indicate that this is not true. "She intentionally misled the court and should be charged with perjury."ĭuring Dr. "We don't make that mistake accidentally and definitely not when we have prepared, edited and looked over testimony for a Senate subcommittee hearing. "As a registered psychologist myself, I know for a fact that California state exams (EPPP) are very difficult to pass and thus, a badge of honor when anyone passes it to finally call oneself a psychologist. In response to the discovery, another psychologist who is registered, Ellie Shekberg, said: This misrepresentation of her credentials has already called into question whether she knowingly committed perjury while under oath. Ford claimed that she was a psychologist in her opening statement, yet California records show there's no Christine Blasey Ford registered as a psychologist in the state, which is a legal requirement. © press Major holes are emerging in Christine Blasey Ford's testimonyĪfter Christine Blasey Ford gave an almost convincing testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, major plot holes have begun to surface in the statement she gave under oath.Įarlier, Neon Nettle reported on how Dr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |